Does this ring a bell? From this post: In his conclusion that much of the misery on this planet is a consequence of our attempt to deny our animal nature, the question for Reich is: how could we so willingly give over [our] destiny to the state and the great leader? (p. 93) Because we’re such suckers for promises of prosperity and good times ahead if only we follow the great leader, the steady, thoughtful great leader. But, unfortunately, in attempts to avoid natural plagues and disasters by investing our trust in great leaders we unwittingly unleashed another plague brought on by our thoughtless allegiance and obedience to the politician.
Escape 19: All you wanted to know about human evil but were afraid to ask!
Well, it looks like I may just get through this 30 day Becker marathon in 30 days. I’m on Chapter 7 now, which starts on page 91. Since there’s 170 pages in the book I’m close to half way there.
As noted earlier, Becker is the great synthesizer. He gleans in a critical way the works of others to build his own model of how the world works. Those ‘others’ include hundreds of scholars of all disciplines as can be verified by a glance at the bibliographic entries in his many books, but major influences have been Hocart, Huizinga, Brown and Rank. The school of psychoanalysis to which Becker subscribes is the school, which broke away from Freud. Rank was a special protégé of Freud’s but could not accept Freud’s Oedipus Complex and other aspects…
View original post 513 more words