This is one way to think about modern capitalism. There are others.
Most of us glide through life not thinking particularly deeply, if at all, about the underlying forces controlling our lives. In fact, we are taught all along that there are no forces that control our lives at all and that we are fully in charge of our lives whatever we make of them. That belief is actually part of the very real underlying forces I just mentioned, one that aims to line up our personal lives in such a way that we don’t question the forces that drive us to behave in certain ways and not in others.
An example might help. I’m sure you found yourself recently in a grocery store buying food for the week, or maybe just for dinner, assuming that is that you have enough money to actually shop in grocery stores and not in dumpsters, but that’s another matter I’ll deal with later. Two aspects of this shopping scenario are of interest to me here. First is the idea of the store itself. How many of us actually question the very existence of the store? Not many, I’m sure.
Stores are such a regular and ubiquitous part of life that we tend to think of them as just part of the landscape, as places to go buy things, certainly, that is if we think of them at all. Well, a store is nothing more than a place where things are stored, awaiting distribution or for people to come along and pick them up in exchange for money. People have been storing things ever since the dawn of humankind.
Finding secure places to store food and other goods has been a human preoccupation throughout history (and pre-history for that matter). In a situation where food is readily available and there is no worry about spoilage because it’s consumed very soon after it’s collected, storage isn’t an issue. This was true, for instance, of the !Kung San in Southern Africa before colonialism. It does become an issue when there is a large number of people to feed and where food can become scarce at times. Obviously, food storage is not so much an option for nomadic as opposed to settled peoples so it has been a very important pre-occupation of humankind especially for the last ten thousand years or so since the advent of large scale domestication, settlement and formal government. Preserving food then becomes imperative and storing it securely even more so.
So, we’ve needed to store food and other products for a long time. Once food and other goods are in storage, they need to be made available to people for consumption. Not just any people, of course. In what we know of pre-history and early history, family was the most important unit of distribution. People would pass around chunks of meat around the campfire. As we went along as a species especially in certain parts of the world we now know as the Middle East, Europe and the Far East, the units of distribution grew ever larger driven by domestication and urbanization. Well, that was then, what about now?
Eventually, political units tended to grow in size and motivations changed. There was an increasing need to mobilize, equip and feed large numbers of people for various tasks like war, agriculture, large infrastructure projects like water diversions, roads, sanitation systems as well as religiously inspired projects like pyramids, cathedrals and the like. This historical development required innovations in storage management and distribution. Centralized storage systems like granaries, warehouses and eventually freezing and cold storage facilities grew more prevalent. But of course, human production never occurs in a vacuum. Production, distribution and consumption, the three ‘moments’ of human production are not just economically but also politically driven for the most part and limited by the availability of raw materials, labour and technology. In our time, and for the past three centuries, give or take a few decades, business has been increasingly dominant in all phases of human production. Business. Yes, business.
Business is a method, a way of organizing human activities, most predominantly economic activity. That said, the ways and means of business have become pervasive in all types of organizations, governments and non-profit. It’s a truism to say that businesses exist to make money. That’s not all they exist for, but if they don’t make money they don’t last long (unless they get government subsidies which they often do). And what is the interest of business in human production? Well, as I noted above, business is an organizational vehicle for the production, distribution, and often, the consumption of commodities. Note that I said business is in it for the creation of commodities not products.
Commodities are products specifically created for the market. General Motors doesn’t make vehicles for its own use, it makes them to sell. Once a vehicle is sold it no longer holds any interest for GM. In fact, if people, car buyers, were more concerned with GM’s welfare (as GM thinks they should be) they would drive their vehicles into the first power pole they encountered upon leaving the auto dealer lot. That would mean an opportunity for GM to sell another vehicle to replace the one just smashed up against the power pole. Smashing up cars is good for business.
Of course, the scenario I just painted is simplistic and the real situation is much more complex, but the truth is that business makes products to sell. We call those products commodities. Distribution businesses like grocery stores are also in the business of making money but their challenge is somewhat different than GM’s. Grocery businesses have conditioned us over the decades to expect a myriad of consumable commodities on their shelves. People (like you and I) get very upset when they see empty shelves or even half empty shelves in their favourite grocery store. I can hear people saying to themselves “What’s wrong? Why are the shelves getting empty? Should I stock up?” Fear and panic can set in. So, it’s better to keep the shelves topped up to avoid triggering a sense of doom and scarcity.
The reality is that grocers can never sell all the commodities that grace their shelves so masses of produce, meats, dairy products and other perishable items get tossed in the garbage every day. That is of no fundamental concern to the grocer (can you say Jimmy Pattison) as long as on average and over the long term enough commodities get sold to still make a profit. The ‘wastage’ is collateral damage. If food producers and distributors actually made food to consume rather than to sell, there would be no hungry people on the planet. But that’s not the way our world works. We allow people to starve if they have no money to bring to the market to exchange for food. It’s all about the market.
People get consumed too in the productive process. We sell our labour-power to a buyer at the best price we can get if we’re lucky and that buyer then has the ownership of our time and our capacity to work. Our time spent at work is not our time. It belongs to our employer.
However, my point is that we have to own ourselves in order to sell ourselves just like we have to own a rutabaga to sell it. That’s a basic legal foundation of capitalism. As owners of our labour-power we enter the market as free players, at least in theory. And if we are free players in the market we must also be free players in other aspects of our lives. It’s a singular philosophical expression of the reality of life in a capitalist society. More on this in another post. This one’s long enough already.
Dr. Bruce Lipton explains how we get programmed early in life to accept the reality we are presented with: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7TivZYFlbX8
2 thoughts on “It’s your life, so sell it along with the rutabaga!”
Some of the things we never question:
Mortgages. Seen as the primary investment and as essential to ones well being and freedom. I call them tools of the slave master.
Patriotism. One’s love of country. A sense of pride and belonging. We are willing to lay down our lives to protect it. I call it hegemony and protecting the status quo (the capitalists who actually rule).
Government for the people. Nope government is also there to protect the stays quo. And, call it democracy which I adore the majority of people are uniformed on the issues that affect their lives because they are so busy working for their employers to make ends meet and pay their mortgages that they have no time or energy to become participants in their democracy and they are patriotic enough to believe the government has their best interests at heart…
The automobile. My dad fought in wars so GM could give me the “freedom” to choose between some 30 or more new models every year. We seem to have invested a lot of our freedom in our choices of homes and automobiles… etc.
Interesting, Jack. Time for me to write again. I haven’t really done much yet in terms of an analysis of the relations between capitalism, liberalism and democracy. Maybe it’s time to introduce the connection between liberalism and capitalism before turning to the very slippery concept of democracy.
Comments are closed.